Mr. Moore's Written Submissions Rubric
|
||||
4
(82-100%) |
3
(72-78%) |
2
(62-68%) |
1
(52-58%) |
|
Ideas
|
Excellent thinking went into this, including creativity and originality.
|
Good thinking went into this, including some innovation.
|
Some thought went into this.
|
Very little thought went into this.
|
Structure/Organization
|
Extremely well organized. Structure compliments the piece.
|
Well organized. Structured in a way that works.
|
Somewhat well organized.
|
Not very well organized. Structure does not help the piece.
|
Mechanics
|
Free of errors in formatting, spelling, grammar and punctation. Conventions of English are used to strengthen the piece and convey meaning.
|
Few errors in formatting, spelling, grammar and punctuation.
|
Some errors in formatting, spelling, grammar and punctuation.
|
Significant number of errors in formatting, spelling, grammar and punctation.
|
Tone/Voice/Style
|
Matches intended readership and has a distinctive personality and a memorable quality.
|
Matches intended readership.
|
Matches intended readership somewhat.
|
Does not match intended readership (too formal, too informal, too technical, not technical enough).
|
Flow
|
Sentences compliment one another and work together harmoniously, setting each other up, calling forward and back to and from one another..
|
Sentences are adept and flow well both internally and from one to the other.
|
Sentences have a certain amount of inner consistency and flow somewhat.
|
Sentences are awkward and clunky and do not flow well.
|
Wording
|
Extremely well-worded, including evocative, memorable word choices and clever turns of phrase.
|
Well-worded.
|
Somewhat well-worded.
|
Not very well-worded.
|
|
|
|
|
|